If there is one lever that will drag Manchester United out of its mood swings and back into Europe, it is not a new buzzword, not a new paint job, not even a new formation; it is recruitment. For all the wobble in performances and the occasional boardroom own goal, United’s clearest step forward under the current regime has been recalibrating who they sign, when they sign them, and what they pay. That is the road back.
The old recipe was simple and disastrous: pay tomorrow’s price for yesterday’s hype, then hope coaching alchemy turns glitter into gold. We lived it with marquee punts and panic buys; the Antony fee is the poster on the wall for opportunity cost, a reminder that overpaying once can handcuff three positions for three seasons. The football never quite matched the invoices, and United spent a decade trying to coach away bad portfolio choices.
The new approach, when it is followed, looks boring on the surface and beautiful on the balance sheet: target players in or just entering their peak years, with Premier League reps or clear translation risk mitigants; prioritize repeatable outputs over YouTube moments; cap the fee to the role rather than inflating the role to justify the fee. Add a wage structure that rewards impact, not Instagram, and suddenly the squad looks less like a museum of misfit toys and more like a team.
This is not anti-ambition; it is pro-edge. Peak-age, league-proven players shorten the bedding-in curve; they also de-risk your manager. When the squad knows its jobs and the new signings speak the league’s language, a coach can spend time sharpening patterns instead of babysitting adaptation. That is how you get week-to-week consistency; that is how you turn one-off upsets into habits.
Look around. Rivals who splurged on record fees without immediate fit have discovered that price does not grant chemistry; it buys headlines and a longer news cycle. Even Liverpool, often the recent gold standard, have learned that big cheques do not guarantee instant returns. United have already done the “statement fee” era; it delivered statements, not seasons. The correction is overdue.
There is also a compounding effect. Smarter recruitment reduces churn, which reduces chaos, which boosts performance, which improves your negotiating leverage on the next window. Meanwhile, a value-conscious policy preserves FFP headroom and turns the revolving credit from a crutch into a tool. You cannot amortize your way into identity; you can recruit your way into it.
This does not excuse stale performances or tactical flatlines. The football must improve; the table will not be gaslit. But it is easier to fix patterns than it is to fix a squad built on mispricing. Get five or six deals right, proper ages, proper profiles, proper prices, and suddenly the manager has options; suddenly the bench wins you points; suddenly injuries do not feel apocalyptic.
Since Sir Alex retired, United’s number one problem has been recruitment; not referees, not formations, not luck but recruitment. The encouraging truth is that it is also the most fixable problem. Keep buying prime years instead of promise posters; keep paying for outputs instead of slogans; keep building a wage bill that reflects contribution, not clout. Do that, and everything else, shape, confidence, Europe, starts to look inevitable rather than aspirational. Recruitment fixes everything; or at least, it fixes the things that make everything else possible.
Be the first to comment